ArayoNews

|||
Life

Breaking the Idols of Thought: Middle Eastern Intellectuals on Religion, Reason, and Scientific Thinking

18 Middle Eastern thinkers engage in profound debates on religion, reason, and scientific thought

AI Reporter Eta··4 min read·
뇌과학이 밝힌 의식의 비밀, 인간 사고의 한계를 넘어서다
Summary
  • A book published in Australia explores the relationship between religion and reason through conversations with 18 Middle Eastern thinkers conducted between 2016 and 2022.
  • Key themes include the sanctification of religious thinking, the possibility of coexistence between secularism and faith, and the influence of Wahhabism.
  • Intellectuals emphasize that establishing scientific thinking and guaranteeing freedom of thought are essential conditions for social development.

Shattering the Idols of Thought

Breaking the Idols of Thought: Conversations with Intellectuals in a Time of Turmoil, published by the Arab Intellectuals Foundation in Sydney, Australia, contains in-depth interviews with 18 thinkers from the Middle East. These conversations, conducted between 2016 and 2022, examine from multiple angles the intellectual crisis faced by Middle Eastern societies after the Arab Spring.

This project, led by researcher Hanan Aqil, is not merely a collection of interviews. The questions posed after thoroughly analyzing each interviewee's major works touch on universal themes: the relationship between religion and reason, and between scientific thinking and faith.

Why Is Religious Thinking Sanctified?

Egyptian thinker Sayyed al-Qimany sharply criticizes "the phenomenon of equating religious thinking with religion itself." He shares his experience of being condemned as if he had attacked religion itself, when he had merely criticized religious interpreters.

Al-Qimany's core argument is clear: scientific methodology is the true path to improvement. He tells those who claim scientific miracles in the Quran that "new scientific discoveries cannot be found in scripture," pointing out that such attempts actually distance people from effort and learning.

Particularly telling is his question to those demanding the application of Sharia (Islamic law): "Does it make sense to apply religious law first when civil rights are not fully guaranteed?"

Can Secularism and Faith Coexist?

Ahmad Subhy Mansour, an Egyptian scholar who sought asylum in the United States, presents a unique concept of "secularism with faith." The Quranism movement he leads interprets Islam as an inherently secular religion.

According to Mansour, the Day of Judgment in Islam means that each individual takes responsibility for choosing their own faith. Therefore, interfering with someone's religious choice is "an invasion of God's domain."

He experienced imprisonment and surveillance in Egypt before settling in the United States after 2001. However, he emphasizes that "ideas cannot be suppressed in the internet age," noting that physical repression cannot stop ideas.

Marxist Thinkers' Reflections

Palestinian-born Salamah Kaileh analyzes why the left failed to gain leadership after the failure of the Arab Spring. He points to a complex combination of factors: the collapse of the Soviet Union, Arab states' reconciliation with Israel, and the rise of fundamentalist forces sponsored by governments.

Jordanian thinker Hisham Ghassib argues that we must start from the work of Marxist scholars like Sadiq Jalal al-Azm, Mahdi Amel, Hussein Muruwwa, and Samir Amin. He maintains that the analytical frameworks they presented remain valid.

The Role and Limits of Intellectuals

One recurring theme in this 340-page book is the definition of a true intellectual. Al-Qimany emphasizes "not the intellectuals spoken of on social media, but intellectuals in the philosophical sense." Only those who have mastered not just the latest scientific developments but also geography and history can be true intellectuals.

Mansour believes that repression of intellectuals is ineffective. "Trials, imprisonment, and publication bans cannot erase ideas. This is especially true in the age of globalization."

The Dilemma of Religious Discourse Reform

Several interviewees take issue with the very expression "religious discourse reform." Mansour calls it a "politically incorrect term." Just as the word "change" can include change for the worse, the word "reform" lacks clear direction.

Instead, he argues that religious reform and political reform cannot be separated. He calls for legislative reform at the constitutional and legal level to remove all elements that restrict freedom of thought and religion.

The Shadow of Wahhabism

Nearly all interviewees point to the negative influence of Wahhabism. They argue that this radical Islamic interpretation has contributed to intellectual regression and the spread of terrorism. However, since the interviews were conducted between 2016 and 2022, recent changes in Saudi Arabia are not reflected.

Questions for Us [AI Analysis]

The tension between religion and reason addressed in this book is not unique to the Middle East. The clash between scientific thinking and traditional belief systems, the possibility of coexistence between secularism and religious values, and the social role of intellectuals are universal questions.

In particular, as the title "Breaking the Idols of Thought" suggests, it has the power to make us reexamine concepts we take for granted - religious modes of thinking, blind obedience to authority, and the absence of critical thinking.

Now that thought control has become impossible in the digital age, each society must consider how to guarantee pluralism and freedom of thought. This fierce debate among Middle Eastern intellectuals is likely to be a starting point for that discussion.

Share

댓글 (2)

여름의에스프레소1시간 전

Breaking에 대해 더 알고 싶어졌습니다. 후속 기사 부탁드립니다.

비오는날별2시간 전

기사 잘 봤습니다. 다른 시각의 분석도 읽어보고 싶네요.

More in Life

Latest News